Resource

    How Vertica grounds and audits AI-generated claims

    The review path separates supplied evidence, factual classification, and external verification so a generated claim does not become trusted merely because it sounds plausible.

    Review flow

    Evidence first, verdicts second

    01

    Plan evidence

    Company inputs, research ingredients, and the fact pack form the evidence supplied to section generation and review.

    02

    Factual review

    The review classifies hard claims as supported, unsupported, or needing verification and returns a pass, revise, or block verdict.

    03

    Flagged-claim search

    A flagged claim can be searched on the web and adjudicated against the returned results.

    04

    Source guard

    Returned citations must match the search result URLs. A decisive result without a surviving source is downgraded to inconclusive.

    Human review

    The panel surfaces uncertainty instead of hiding it

    The grounding check is available per plan section. It flags work for review; it does not silently convert an unsupported claim into an approved one.

    Final review and approval remain visible customer decisions.

    Request access

    Bring your next vertical plan into one shared workspace.

    Registrations are invite-only. Join the waitlist to request access.

    Access is invite-only. We invite from the waitlist, oldest first.